1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | residents receiving hospice care. Administrator stated that they suggested one Hospice agency because R1's roommate was already receiving services from them. Administrator stated that she suggested that agency because she wanted to avoid having multiple people coming into the facility, due to COVID.
Administrator stated that she had mentioned to R1's daughters that R1 could have a private room and receive services from the family's preferred hospice agency, however, never received a call back regarding the suggestion.
11/16/21- LPA Angela Hood contacted the preferred hospice agency and spoke with the Clinical Manager (CM). CM stated that she remembers resident (R1). CM stated that Olive Oaks Care initially refused hospice services from the preferred agency.
As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care.
Report reviewed with Licensee . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. |