1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the falls, the facility informed the Primary Care Physician, had the resident reassessed and took additional fall prevention measures documented in his care plan and file. The facility received an order for a high/low hospital bed, obtained fall mats, requested and received an order for a gait belt and wheelchair, rearranged the common area, employed a one to one care giver for a period of time and obtained a referral to a neurologist. The resident was moved out of the facility by his family prior to the neurologist appointment. While the resident did have several falls at the facility, the facility took multiple steps to reassess the resident and address the falls.
Regarding the allegation that the resident lost weight at the facility due to abuse/neglect: The LPA reviewed the residents file and obtained copies of pertinent documents. The resident's Physician’s Report (LIC 602) from 2/17/20 show the resident's weight at 161. Weight on 3/16/20 was 155, 4/29/21 was 155, 7/22/20 was 143 and weight was 149 on 10/21/20 when the resident left the facility. The facility staff did observe the resident's health condition and loss of weight. The resident was reported to be very active, have difficulty chewing and swallowing and a decreased appetite. The facility provided staff to assist the resident at meal times and also contacted the resident's physician and received an order for a fortified diet which helped to stabilize then increase his weight. Interviews and records document the efforts of the facility to help with the resident's nutrition as the resident's physical and mental condition was reported to be declining rapidly. .
Regarding the allegation that the facility denied the resident video calls, the investigation determined the following information: The facility did allow and help facilitate video calls and window visits between residents and their family members. There was no evidence that the facility ever denied the video calls. There were times when the electronic devices were not available as the devices were being used with other residents, that was determined not to be intentional denial. As facility lock downs and restrictions on in person visitation were imposed, the facility initially had three iPad tablets and that number was increased to 6 as the facility was able to obtain more devices. Documentation of the video visits was obtained
Interviews and records document the efforts of the facility to help with the resident's nutrition and also to enhance their fall prevention actions. While there were specific times that the facility was not able to facilitate video visits, there was no evidence the facility ever specifically denied the visits. Statements obtained from other sources provided information that was contrary to the medical records and information obtained from the facility. For those reasons, these allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding may mean that while the allegation may be true, there was not insufficient evidence to prove the allegation to be true. |