1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The incident reports were faxed to the Department on 02/18/2026 at 11:57 p.m. On 03/02/2026, staff notified R1’s responsible party that R1 was coughing up yellow phlegm. X-ray results showed no fractures, only arthritis. A home health nurse evaluated R1 and noted low blood pressure. Staff requested that 911 be called; however, R1 refused. On 03/04/2026, R1’s responsible party transported R1 to the hospital. The related incident reports were faxed to the Department on 03/04/2026 at 6:44 p.m., therefore, the Department was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff failed to seek timely medical attention.
It was alleged that staff did not timely address a resident’s change in medical condition and staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, residents, and the resident responsible party. Throughout the course of the investigation, it was learned that on 02/18/2026, at approximately 10:00 a.m., R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall in their room. Licensee Benitez called paramedics at approximately 1:30 p.m.; however, R1 refused evaluation and transportation. R1 was later transported to the hospital on 02/20/2026. No injuries were identified, and R1 was discharged with a diagnosis of arthritis. On 02/27/2026, R1 spent the day with their responsible party, who reported no signs of illness. On 02/28/2026, staff observed that R1 appeared tired and went to bed after breakfast. On 03/01/2026, R1 continued to report fatigue and began producing yellow phlegm. On 03/02/2026, R1 was transported to UC Davis Medical Center with low blood pressure and was admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock. Records and interviews showed that staff contacted paramedics after R1’s fall, but R1 refused medical care. Staff continued monitoring R1 and sought medical attention when R1’s symptoms persisted and worsened. Therefore, the Department was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff did not timely address a resident’s change in medical condition and that staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident.
The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Benitec and the LIC 9099 report was provided to the facility at the end of the visit.
PAGE 3 |