1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | WH stated that she called R1's POA, who agreed to the appointment and met her and R1 at R1's physician's office. WH reported that POA drove in from out of town, and that POA comes to visit R1 infrequently, perhaps twice a month. R1, POA, and WH all physically went into the appointment with R1's physician.
LPA Gasendo called R1's physician, who confirmed that there was no unusual behavior or ill will exhibited by any of the parties during the examination. R1's physician said that POA did not ask for WH to stay out of the examination room at any point during the visit, and did not think it to be unusual for WH to be there since she was a nurse who gave care to R1 and would benefit from knowing details about his condition.
After the examination, POA reported to County Ombudsman that he was upset about WH being at the appointment and expressed his belief that WH had violated HIPPA laws by being in the examination room.
LPA Gasendo called R1's physician, who said that he does not have any formal policy regarding visitors but that he does ask patients if they want to have visitors.
R1's physician stated that R1 has severe dementia, and would not be able to make judgment on whether to bring a visitor or not. R1's physician said the next person he would ask would be the power of attorney or conservator. R1's physician states that "nothing unusual" happened at all during the appointment, and was "really surprised" to hear that the POA filed a complaint. R1's physician stated that if the POA had a problem with WH being there "he could have told me not to have her there" and he would not have allowed her to join.
LPA Gasendo attempted to call POA multiple times and left voice messages. POA did not respond to the inquiry. (Continued on 9099-C). |