1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Moleski reviewed this facility’s written theft and loss policy. The policy states that the facility shall “document loss of personal property within 72 hours of the discovery of the loss or theft” and that “documentation will be made and maintained on Licensing Form #9060.” In an interview, Revera said these forms were not used to document the missing items as described above. The facility’s existing documentation regarding the missing rings does not contain estimated values for the items, as required per HSC Section 1569.153(c)(2), despite estimates of the missing rings having been given to police on 4/22/24.
Additionally, R1’s RP told LPA Moleski that a chair owned by R1’s family was not present in R1’s room upon R1’s death. LPA Moleski interviewed the facility’s memory care director (S1), who was aware that the chair had been reported missing. S1 did not know the location of the chair, and said that it may have been moved out of the room at some point to prevent falls. A report of this missing chair was not included in any of the incident reports received by LPA Moleski, and no report was made on an LIC 9060 form as specified in this facility’s theft and loss policy.
Based on the above findings, this facility shall not be liable for repayment or replacement of the missing items, as they were not entered into an inventory of personal property. However, the facility has not implemented several required elements of its theft and loss program: The facility did not document the missing items described above as stipulated in its theft and loss policy, did not include estimated values of the rings, did not document the missing chair, did not conduct semiannual reviews of theft and loss procedures and policies, and did not provide R1 and/or R1’s RP with HSC Sections 1569.152 through 1569.154 upon admission. Therefore, based on interviews, observation, and record review, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED, which means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met.
This facility is hereby cited per HSC Section 1569.153. An exit interview was held with Revera. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Quintanilla. |