1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On 6/27/21, Analyst, Mike Reber met with Maurissa Eidenshink, Business Office Coordinator. The purpose of the visit was to deliver investigation findings into the above stated allegations. Prior to entering the facility, analyst spoke with staff to pre-screen that the facility is COVID free. Analyst also self-screened for having no known symptoms or exposure. Analyst followed facility's screening, wore an N-95 respirator and maintained distance during the visit. During the course of the investigation, this analyst conducted interviews and obtained/reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation.
An interview with the reporting party (RP) indicates that he received a phone call from the facility on October 5, 2020 notifying him that resident (R1) was more confused and disoriented than usual and that R1 was sent to the hospital for further observation and evaluation. RP states that he received a phone call the following day from the facility and they had recommended that R1 be moved to the memory care for increased supervision. RP states that he reluctantly agreed to move his father from the assisted living unit to the memory care unit during that phone call.
Based on information obtained, Analyst finds the allegations to be UNFOUNDED – a finding meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.
As a result of this investigation, no deficiencies were cited, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6.
Exit interview conducted. Copy of report left with facility staff.
|
Unfounded | Estimated Days of Completion: |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Lack of supervision resulting in a resident assaulting another resident while in care, causing injuries.
Interviews with staff indicate that R2 had behaviors of going into resident rooms uninvited, laying in their bed and going through other resident belongings. Progress notes for R2 revealed that on 11/2, 11/8, 11/9, 11/11, and 11/13/20, R2 wandered in other resident rooms and during some of those incidences R2 became agitated and aggressive upon redirection. In addition, on 11/1/20 R2 became "very agitated and took a swing" at a staff attempting to give R2 a shower.
On 11/9/20, the RP expressed concerns to the facility in an email about R2 walking into R1 room uninvited. RP was assured by facility staff in the email thread that it "will get addressed immediately". On 11/10/20, the RP emailed the facility again asking "Was anything found out about this?" Facility staff emailed RP regarding R2's behavior on the same day (11/10/20) stating "I can assure you that he is not trying to bother anyone on purpose he just doesn't recognize his own space." On 11/11/20, R2 injured R1 when confronted by R1 upon entering his room causing R1 to go to the hospital. Analyst obtained a Personal Service Plan for R2 and observed that exit seeking behavior was the only behavioral issue being addressed by the facility. |
Substantiated | Estimated Days of Completion: |
|
Deficiency Type
POC Due Date /
Section Number | DEFICIENCIES | PLAN OF CORRECTIONS(POCs) |
Type A
06/29/2021
Section Cited
CCR
87411(a) | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Personnel Requirements - General
Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs.
| 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | To protect the health and safety of residents, administrator shall reassess the needs and services plan for R2 to ensure appropriate staffing and supervision are being provided based on R2's current needs. Submit updated needs and services plan to LPA with a statement of statement of understanding of this regulation by POC due date of 6/29/2021. |
 | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews conducted the facility did not address resident's (R2) aggressive behavior on the unit resulting in injury to R1. This poses an immediate risk to the resident's health and safety.
| 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 |  |
Type B
07/09/2021
Section Cited
HSC
1569.657(a) | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Rate increase due to change in level of resident care; notice: For any rate increase due to a change in the level of care of the resident, the licensee shall provide the resident and the resident’s representative, if any, written notice of the rate increase within two business days after initially providing services at the new level of care. | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Administrator shall provide training regarding this regulation to all staff involved in the process of billing and rate increases. Submit attendance sheet of staff participating in the training and a statement of understanding of this regulation to LPA by POC due date of 7/9/21. |
 | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, R1 was moved to memory care unit on 10/7/20, the addendum to the resident agreement was provided to the responsible party on 10/14/20. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care. | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 |  |