1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to interviews with staff, residents and document reviews, S1 dispensed medication to R1 that was a greater milligram strength that had been prescribed by a healthcare professional. According to staff reports, R1 was monitored closely for any alarming side effects after being given the wrong dosage and S1 was removed from the position of being able to dispense medication.
Furthermore, based on witness interviews and documentation received, resident prescriptions were not being filled in a timely manner. Based on documentation review, during the period of time including May 2022 to present, there were instances that medication was not being dispensed because the prescribed refills had not taken place in time for resident’s regular medication regimen to be consistent.
Based on interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC-9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to James Hall . |