1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The broken water pipe and the damage it caused were repaired within a 3-day period.
The Department found the allegation, "Facility did not repair broken plumbing in a timely manner," unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
According to interviews with the ED, R1 and maintenance worker (M1), the facility offered R1 the opportunity to relocate to another room for the duration of the repairs. R1 declined. They also offered to provide R1 with access to the shower in the model room. R1 also declined that offer. The Department found the allegation, "Facility did not ensure resident receives a bath/shower," unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Through interviews with the ED and with R1, this LPA learned that R1 preferred things very organized and had them just the way they wanted them in their home. When urgent repairs were conducted in their bathroom, maintenance removed R1's personal items and put them outside of the bathroom so they could conduct the repairs. When they completed the work, housekeeping conducted a routine clean-up. R1 was not pleased and contacted management to have them do another cleaning. When this LPA asked what was not done by housekeeping, R1 said that everything was still all over the place and that they had not returned R1's personal items to their original locations. Some hygiene items were returned to the bathroom and others were still in R1's living area and not where they were supposed to be. LPA asked if the sink area, toilet, tub/shower and floors were clean. R1 said yes, they were, although "it was a bit dusty behind the toilet". The facility sent housekeeping in twice in an attempt to meet R1's standards. Regarding the allegation, "Resident's room is in disrepair," the Department found the allegation unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
LPA interviewed the ED, M1, R1 and reviewed a work order dated 12/29/25. This LPA learned that on 12/29/25, a work order was created at 8:49 AM. According to the work order, by 9:40 AM the problem had been resolved. The notes on the work order read," PTAC unit keeps tripping the main breaker. Was able to |