1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, “Staff did not provide food in the quantity necessary to meet resident's needs” On 5/7/2020, LPA observed 3 residents having lunch which consisted of Chow Mein, chopped Chicken and lemon Cake for dessert. LPA observed R1 inquiring about the menu for lunch, saying, “Okay I’ll eat that”. LPA observed R1 eating by self and initially refusing assistance from staff. R1 accepted encouragement from staff at the end of the meal. R1 also requested warm water to drink.
LPA observed R1 eating 1 small piece of the chicken breast by self and 2 forks of Chow Mein with staff assistance. Staff then coached R1 to eat 1 more bite at which time R1 said no and picked up the fork and ate 1 more bite by self. R1 then drank a cup of tea and a cup of hot water telling staff “no more”. R1 then drank the Ensure that was offered and 1 fork of lemon cake with a reminder to chew and swallow. Afterwards, R1 requested cold water. LPA observed the Preplacement Appraisal Information LIC603 dated 5/13/2019 which indicates R1 can feed self sometimes. LPA observed on the LIC602 dated 5/18/2019 indicates R1 can feed self.
LPA observed on the following dates of 2020 that R1 was able to communicate not hungry and opted to skip a meal: 2/6 ,2/17, and 4/22.
On the following dates R1 opted to skip a meal and requested a snack on 2/20/20, and 3/23/20. The Daily Report Sheet indicated on these dates R1 did not eat much 4/19/20, 4/23/20, 4/24/20 and family was notified on 4/25/20, 4/26/20, 4/27/20,4/28/20, 4/29/20, 5/1/20, 5/4/20, 5/5/20 at which time R1 would only eat 2-3 bites of food but would drink the ensure. On 5/6 R1 ate 30% of food and drank the ensure. On 5/2/20, R1 began medication to improve appetite at which time staff began spoon feeding R1 to assist.
During an interview with the Administrator on 5/7/2020, she stated that R1 was initially eating by self but began to decline and only eat a tiny bit. She stated that all the residents receive the same portion of food. The responsible party was notified and would supply Ensure for R1. The Physician supplied a prescription to assist in increasing R1s appetite.
During an interview with S1 on 5/7/2020, it was revealed that R1 was prescribed a medication to increase the appetite. The physician was informed of the lack of appetite except for sweets, pain, and weakness. S1 stated R1s bowel function was working fine.
During an interview with S2 on 5/7/2020, it was revealed that R1 could only eat very small amounts but even less later. S2 stated that R1 did not complain about the food except to say that it’s too much. R1 likes pastries and cakes but did not like fruits.
As a result of the investigation of this allegation, the preponderance of evidence has not been met. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies are being cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with via telephone and a copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents. |