1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Second allegation: Staff are not meeting residents’ dietary needs. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 informed LPA that the facility does have residents that are on special food diets. Staff #1 provided LPA with a list of all residents that are on a special food diet. Staff #1 denied that allegation and indicated that the facility does their best to meet resident’s dietary needs. LPA conducted interviews with Resident #1-4 regarding the alleged allegation and Residents #1-4 denied the allegation and informed LPA that they have no issues to report regarding their meals and stated that the facility meets their dietary needs daily.
Third allegation: Staff ignore residents. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation and Staff #1 denied the allegation. Staff #1 informed LPA that they have not witnessed residents being ignored by staff. LPA conducted interviews with Resident #1-5 regarding the alleged allegation and Resident #1-5 denied the allegation and informed LPA that all staff are nice and respectful. Resident #1-5 informed LPA that staff respond to residents when assistance is needed. Resident #1-5 further indicated that they have no issues to report concerning their care. Based on corroborating evidence LPA has determined that the above allegation is Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Facility Administrator Maria Cervantes. |