1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | No other documentation was provided to show that R1 refused to be bathed. Interviews with independent witnesses revealed that residents are clean and hygiene needs are met. Not all relevant parties were able to be interviewed therefore LPA was unable to corroborate that staff failed to meet the hygiene needs of R1.
The second allegation alleges staff neglect resulted in resident developing a pressure injury. A review of Home Health records indicated on August 19, 2020; ComCare Home Health received a referral for services. On August 20, 2020 ComCare Home Health went out to the facility to conduct an evaluation and observed the wounds and completed a referral to authorize Home Health Services. Treatment by ComCare Home Health began on the same day, August 20, 2020 with subsequent visits continuing every other day thereafter until the wounds were healed. According to interviews, R1 and facility staff were instructed to have R1 remain in bed but to rotate positions to relieve pressure from affected areas. Facility records indicated that resident was turned in bed every 2 hours during the safety check. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 was turned every 2 hours. Based on observations of the records it is unclear when staff may have notified the Med Tech or Administrator about R1’s skin breakdown. LPA is unable to corroborate that R1 developed a pressure injury due to staff neglect as not all relevant parties were available to be interviewed.
The third allegation alleges staff are not ensuring that resident linens are clean. Interviews with independent witnesses revealed that witnesses have never gone to the facility and observed that R1’s linens were not cleaned. Interviews with staff revealed a bed bath is given to R1 2 times/week, and at that time R1’s linens were changed as well. R1 is also changed every 2 hours so if there was a need for a linen change the staff would change the linens during that time. The bed sheets get changed on average 3 to 4 times/week. Not all relevant parties were able to be interviewed therefore LPA was unable to corroborate that staff were not ensuring that resident linens were clean.
Although the above-mentioned allegations may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Administrator Anna Marie Santos, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of the above-mentioned documents. |