1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Bedside drawer or cabinet.” Staff reported a lockbox was not provided to the resident, because R1 had not made a request for a lockbox. Additionally, the resident was not paying an extra fee for a lockbox to be provided.
It is alleged that staff failed to safeguard resident’s personal belongings. While interviewing R1 and the witness, LPA learned that; after R1 was relocated to the new room, R1 was given $150 in cash. After spending an amount of the cash; it was put away in his room within his belongings. R1 left for the day and returned to find that the cash was no longer in his room. R1 brought this to the attention of staff.
Staff suggested R1 contact the Police to make a report. R1 refused to call the Police with the claim that R1 would not get their money back. R1 also reported that while staff was assisting him with moving his belongings to this new room, all of belongings were not moved. Staff interviews revealed that photos were taken to catalog the relocation. During the move the resident signed and stated a statement in agreement confirming that all his personal belongings were moved to the new room. During a review of records, R1’s Personal Property/Valuables Form, the resident had “no valuables” listed. The form is not dated, therefore it is not complete.
It is alleged that staff failed to reimburse the resident. After R1 informed management staff of incident, management and the Corporate Office agreed to reimburse the resident the cash that was allegedly stolen from his room in the amount of $80.00. Although, it was 2 months before management honored the request the resident was reimbursed in cash in the amount of $80.00 on 5/16/2023. Also, during this process Management had initially agreed to reimburse the R1 in the form of a check. R1 expressed that he currently had no state identification and would be unable to cash the check if given to him. Management also honored this request.
Based on staff, resident and witness interviews, review of records and observation, these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted with Araceli Soto, Care Coordinator, this report was reviewed, discusses and provided. |