1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed the administrator and (1) staff present during today’s visit, who stated that a protein is served to the resident every day. LPA observed during the visit that resident were fed protein for lunch. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding “Staff used resident's personal care products on other residents”, it was alleged that staff used private pay residents supplies when the facility ran out. LPA interviewed staff and administrator during the time of the visit who stated that all current residents provide their own supplies. The administrator stated they have a subscription service with Amazon since the facility opened, and receive incontinent supplies on a monthly basis. LPA observed the facility’s incontinent supplies and found that there were enough supplies to be used in case resident ran out of their supplies. LPA also observed (3) resident rooms for incontinent supplies and found that had extra supplies in their room, including supplies that the administrator had supplied them. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding “Staff failed to protect resident from sustaining injury.” It was alleged that R4 had gone to the liquor store and bought liquor, had become intoxicated at the facility, which resulted in a fall and stitched to R4 forehead. LPA interviewed administrator who stated that the resident only went on supervised outings to the store, with them and staff 1 (S1). They stated that R4 did not purchase alcohol during their time at the facility. R4 is unable to be interviewed as they are now deceased. LPA interviewed S1 during the time of the visit who stated that R2 did sustain a fall where the resident had to have stitched to their forehead, but that this fall had occurred at night when the resident got up to go to the bathroom. LPA could not find any evidence to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is also unsubstantiated.
A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation is valid, the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met.
An exit interview was conducted where this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator, Ana Stark.
|