1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA conducted an interview with S#1 who informed LPA that R#1 was being repositioned 2-hours and facility staff was following hospice treatment according to R#1 treatment plan. S#1 informed LPA about being present when R#1 was being repositioned. LPA conducted interviews with S#2, S#3, and S#4 who informed LPA that staff support has been consistent. S#3, and S#4, informed LPA that facility does a good job on hiring staff, and that they have not witness facility being low on staffing support. LPA conducted interviews with R#2, R#3, and R#4, all residents informed LPA that they have lived at the facility for over two years and have no concerns regarding their care. R#2, R#3, and R#4, informed LPA that facility has enough caregivers that help meet resident care needs every day. Based on corroborating evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Unsubstantiated: meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to
Facility Business Office Manager Jonathan Guzman at the end of the visit. |