1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1) who stated that R1 was being seen by the hospice agency often. S1 stated that the facility staff were providing appropriate care for R1 and denied that R1’s passing was a result of neglect by the facility. S1 stated that they were unaware of a “bleeding issue.”
In regards to allegation #2, LPA interviewed S1 who stated that the facility has four to six care staff at the facility during the AM, PM, and NOC shift. S1 stated that the facility also has four additional staff members that can assist with resident care if needed. LPA interviewed Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3), and Resident #4 (R4) who all stated that they believe the facility has adequate staff to meet resident needs. LPA reviewed the facility's staff schedule which confirmed that there are four to six care staff scheduled to be at the facility during each shift.
In regards to allegation #3, upon arrival to the facility, LPA observed the facility's temperature to be comfortable and several thermostat's reading at 75 degrees F. LPA interviewed R2 who stated that the facility had issues with temperature control in the past; however, it has been fixed. LPA interviewed R3 who stated that the facility's temperature is "fine." LPA interviewed S1 who stated that the facility's temperature is kept at 75 degrees F and adjusted as needed.
In regards to allegation #4, LPA reviewed the facility's staff schedule and roster against the roster on Community Care Licensing Division's Guardian roster list and observed that all persons listed on facility schedule were eligible to work and associated to the facility. LPA interviewed S1 who stated that the facility roster is checked and updated frequently. S1 stated that persons without clearance do not get scheduled to work until they have been cleared appropriately with the Department.
In regards to allegation #5, LPA inspected a sample of resident bedrooms and common restrooms, and observed that those rooms were equipped with pull cord signaling systems.
Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of the report was provided to the Administrator via email. |