1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | resident charts were in compliance with regulations. LPA observed no residents in care with a prohibited health condition.
It is alleged that residents are not receiving their medications at night. Interviews with staff revealed that the night shift is 10:00pm to 6:15am. One, (1) caregiver is scheduled for each of the 4 buildings for the night shift. Also, 1 to 2 Medication Technicians are scheduled for the night shift. The 1 or 2 Medication Technicians float between the facility's four, (4) buildings to assist with medications. At this time, there are three (3) residents in care who are scheduled to receive medications during the night shift. According to the Medication Administration Records, (MARS) no resident has missed their night time medications. All Medication Technicians denied that residents have ever missed a medication at night. In the event that a Medication Technician is absent, the scheduled Medication Technician is not permitted to leave the shift until they are relieved by another Medication Technician. If the scheduled Medication Technician is not relieved and can not stay for the following shift, the Wellness Director/ Coordinator is contacted and will cover the shift. Lastly, the staff schedule provided indicates a Medication Technician(s) is scheduled to work every night shift 10pm to 6am.
It is alleged that resident's do not have physician's orders, in place, that would allow the use of postural supports. During walk through, LPA observed no residents utilizing postural supports. LPA did not observe any resident's using wheelchairs with a "Lap Buddy" or seat belts. The bedrails observed being used, were in compliance with regulations. All staff denied witnessing the use of postural supports and denied using postural supports while on duty. Additionally, the facility does retain residents who are receiving hospice services.
We have found the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid: there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to a facility representative. |