1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation, Staff do not have fingerprint clearance. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated that all staff members have a fingerprint clearance. Based on record review, LPA observed all staff members had a criminal record clearance.
For the allegation, Staff lock facility doors to prevent residents from leaving. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated they do not lock the facility to prevent residents from leaving. During resident interviews, 3 out of the 3 residents stated they are allowed to leave the facility and have never been locked inside. During facility tour, LPA Rico did not observe any locks from facility exits.
For the allegation, Staff insert suppositories to residents in care. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated they do not have insert suppositories to residents.
For the allegation, Staff did not complete required training. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated they have completed their required training. Based on record reviews, LPA Rico observed staff have completed their training.
For the allegation, Staff facility records are falsified. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated they have not falsified facility records.
For the allegation, Staff did not maintain resident records. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated residents records are maintained inside the facility and locked. During facility tour, LPA observed resident records were kept inside the facility and locked.
For the allegation, Residents are not provided proper food service. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated proper food service is provided to the residents. During resident interviews, 3 out of the 3 residents had no complaints regarding their food. In addition, LPA observed the facility had proper food and a menu calendar for each month.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the eight(8) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to House Manager Yvonne Gonzalez.
|