1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Licensee stated she was never told verbally the child was allergic to wheat and the allergy to wheat was not listed on the Consent for Medical Treatment form. Staff stated they introduced foods to the child, communicated with the child’s authorized representative of the foods introduced, and the child has never had an allergic reaction to the foods. LPA reviewed the Consent for Medical Treatment form, and the allergy to wheat was not listed. LPA reviewed text communications from the licensee to the child’s authorized representative of the foods introduced.
Based on interviews conducted, there is conflicting information as whether the licensee was told verbally of the child’s allergies to certain foods; therefore, the above allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Allegation: Child terminated due to retaliation.
LPA interviewed all pertinent parties, including the licensee. Licensee stated, almost daily, they had verbal conversations regarding the child’s behavior. Staff stated the child had aggressive behaviors and care was terminated to protect the other children. LPA observed during record review there was nothing in in writing that addressed termination of care.
Based on interviews conducted, there is conflicting information as whether a child was terminated due to retaliation; therefore, the above allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Exit interview conducted with licensee report, appeal rights and notice of site visit issued.
Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |