1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was reported, Licensee will not provide any information to authorized representative concerning their child. While conducting interviews, it was disclosed, there is a joint custody order for the subject child. The facility’s contract was signed by one custodial parent, who did not list the other parent as an authorized representative, upon enrollment of their child. Initially, the licensee communicated with both parents; however, due to one parent not being listed on the enrollment contract as an authorized representative, Licensee stopped communicating with that parent and advised them to contact the child’s enrolling parent for updates. A review of the joint custody order pertaining to childcare indicates “…In exercising joint legal custody, the parties will share in the responsibility and discuss in good faith matters concerning the health, education, and welfare of the child(ren). The parties must discuss and consent in making decisions on the following matters: 1) Enrollment in or leaving a particular private or public school or daycare center.” Another section of the order indicates “..the parents must let each other know the name, address, and phone number of the child(ren)’s regular childcare providers...” Both parents have information regarding the facility, including the licensee’s name, address, and phone number. During the investigation, it was disclosed that the “non-enrolling” parent has toured the facility, prior to enrollment by the other parent. There is conflicting information concerning the above allegation, it is uncertain whether the licensee is refusing to provide information to the “non-enrolling” parent or if the licensee has directed the “non-enrolling” parent to the other custodial parent, based on the custody order. The parties subject to the custody order are the parents, not the licensee.
Based on information obtained during this investigation; through interviews conducted, the review of pertinent documentation, and after receiving conflicting information, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with facility representative Tammy Loring, Appeal Rights were discussed and issued, a copy of this report was provided, and a Notice of Site visit was issued. The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) shall be posted where the parent/guardian of children enter and exit the facility. The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00.
A copy of this report must be made available for the next three years. |