1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099 (Page 2)
During previous visits, multiple LPAs attempted to conduct inspections at the facility at varying times. Interviews conducted disclosed Licensee and staff transport day care children to and from school. Records reviewed revealed most children enrolled are school-age. Information obtained indicated Licensee provides care and supervision to children at the facility when children are unable to attend school. Interviews conducted disclosed children also participate in activities away from the facility with Licensee and staff, such as going to the movies or the park. It is determined there was not sufficient information evident to support the allegation that Licensee is not at the facility 80% of the time.
Based on observations made at the facility, information obtained during interviews, and records reviewed, it is determined that the allegation could not be substantiated or dismissed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee, Luis Ponce-Nava. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |