1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff caused injuries to day care child
It was reported, a staff member injured a daycare child. On 2/13/25 the child sustained an injury to their eye when the staff member accidentally poked the child’s eye. On 3/19/25 the facility self reported an unusual incident report involving the staff member handling the child in a rough manner which caused an injury to the child’s wrist. The child had two marks that appear to be fingernail marks on their wrist. A review of the camera footage from 3/19/25 showed the staff member forcibly grab the child several times by the wrist which could have caused the mark around the child’s wrist.
Based on LPA observations, interviews, and record review on 4/2/25 and 4/11/25, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 & Chapter 1, 101223(a)(2)), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
Staff handled day care child in a rough manner
The facility self reported an unusual incident on 3/19/25 involving a staff member handling a day care child in a rough manner causing an injury. It was reported the child's authorized representative informed the facility they found a mark around their child's wrist. The authorized representative asked the staff member what happened, but they stated they did not know what happened. The Assistant Director conducted an internal investigation where the staff member was interviewed, and camera footage was reviewed. A review of the camera footage showed the staff member forcibly grab the child several times by the wrist which could have caused the mark around the child’s wrist. After review of the camera footage the staff member was terminated. This allegation is substantiated but was addressed during a prior inspection at the facility on 4/2/25 and a Type A deficiency was cited under section entitled Personal Rights 101223(a)(3). A plan of correction was issued, and the facility conducted an in-service training for staff on Personal Rights. Please refer to Case Management report dated 4/2/25.
Based on LPA observations, interviews, and record review on 4/2/25, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 & Chapter 1, 101223(a)(3)), was cited on 4/2/25. |