1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The second allegation alleges the bathroom is in disrepair. During the initial FaceTime phone call with Licensee on October 7, 2020, LPA observed the bathroom to be in disrepair as there were missing tiles around the faucet, tiles were falling off the wall near the baseboard, and paint was chipping above the baseboard which appeared to be water damage. Licensee told LPA on January 23, 2020; Licensee called a plumber out to fix a leaky faucet. At that time there was a discussion with the plumber about a possible slow slab leak. At the end of January 2020, Licensee called for a second opinion on the slab leak. The plumber came in and conducted video surveillance and determined that there was not a slab leak. In June 2020, Licensee called out a carpet cleaning company to shampoo the master bedroom carpet as there was a slow leaky pipe. At that time the carpet was picked up to determine if there was mold under the carpet. The carpet cleaning company determined there was no mold detected. Between June 2020 and November 2020 Licensee noticed additional tiles falling off of the wall and more paint chipping away from the wall. On November 23, 2020, the contractor began to remodel/repair the hallway bathroom. At that time, the slow leaky pipe was discovered and repaired during the remodel. The repairs/remodel did not interrupt the care being provided to the residents as there was another bathroom available for resident use. The remodel/repairs were completed by December 3, 2020. LPA has observed that the water damage has been fixed. No hazards are present in the master bathroom. The master bathroom is still operable. The damage in the master bathroom is from the leaky pipe which was discovered in the middle bathroom and backs up to the hallway bathroom. The master bathroom will be fixed at a later date due to the cost of the repairs.
Based on LPA observations, interviews and review of documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation is substantiated, interviews and documentation revealed there was no impact to the clients as the disrepair's did not present any danger and did not affect the overall operation of the facility. This is considered a technical violation and no citation is being issued at this time.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and appeal rights were provided to Licensee Diane Emerson, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of the above-mentioned documents. |