1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation #2 “Staff did not properly safeguard the facility”. The allegation alleged that a few weeks ago, the facility suffered a break-in, and items were stolen from residents. The allegation alleged that the facility’s administrator assured the reporting party (RP) that a security system and the appropriate door locks would be installed immediately. The allegation alleged that the facility was broken into again, additional items were stolen from residents, and the residents still do not have locks on their doors. Department staff interview with R1 revealed that the intruder entered R1’s room on two (2) separate occasions. R1 stated they could not lock their door because the door latch was broken, preventing them from locking the door. However, R1 acknowledges that the door lock was fixed on February 9, 2021, and Department staff also confirmed that the lock and latch were fixed. Department staff interview with resident #2 revealed that R2 confirmed an intruder in the facility, and their items were stolen. R2 confirmed that they have a lock on their door and that the facility has installed additional locks. Department staff interviews with several facility staff members revealed that all staff interviewed confirmed the break-in and that resident’s items were stolen. However, all staff denied the allegation that the facility did not safeguard the residents' property. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation.
Allegation #3 “Staff did not properly report incidents involving residents while in care”. The allegation alleged that the facility intimidates staff and residents from reporting issues. Department staff interview with the RP revealed that the facility failed to notify them about the break-ins. The RP stated they learned about the break-ins through a family member at the facility. Department staff interview with the administrator revealed that facility staff contacted the police and filed a report. The administrator stated that an incident was faxed to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). LPA Nickolas’ cannot attest whether the facility faxed an incident report to CCLD when this allegation was made.The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation.
A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
LPA Nickolas completed an exit interview, where this report was discussed. LPA Nickolas' also provided Carlos with a copy of this report.
|