1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Inland Regional found that the interactions between the residents and the SA were both positive and caring and did not show signs of abuse. The Inland Regional Center’s investigation found that there was not substantial evidence to prove the allegation occurred.
During the interview conducted with the SA, the SA denied the allegation, explained how good their interactions were with the residents, and explained how all the residents enjoyed being around the SA. The SA assumes that the allegation was made due to retaliation from a prior staff losing their job.
During interviews with the staff, there were no concerns of abuse or neglect regarding the SA. The staff did not see any abuse or any signs of abuse from the SA. The six (6) staff all stated that the interactions between the residents and the SA were positive and caring.
Overall, during the investigation, there was not substantial evidence to collaborate the allegation.
Based on evidence obtained, the IB Investigator deemed the allegation listed above UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Francis Pastorfide, along with a copy of the appeal rights. |