1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The allegation that Facility staff did not assist resident with incontinence care as needed. Based on LPA observations and record reviews, Resident #1 (R1) adult briefs were changed every few hours or as needed. Staff #1 (S1) stated that R1 had frequent bowel movements and was changed 8 to 10 times daily. S1 stated that they always clean and dry R1 during adult brief changes.
The allegation that Facility staff did not follow hospice care plan. Staff #1 (S1) stated that they did everything the hospice nurse told them to do for R1 diaper changes. This included applying cream to the skin. S1 said that they would always clean and dry R1 during diaper changes.
The allegation that Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner. LPA was unable to interview Resident #1 (R1); the resident died on 07/29/2024. LPA interviewed staff, and staff denied handling the resident roughly. LPA was unable to interview other residents in care due to the facility closing on 04/30/2025. There was no evidence to corroborate the allegation.
The allegation that Facility staff stole resident's personal items. LPA was unable to interview Resident #1 (R1); the resident died on 07/29/2024. LPA interviewed staff, and staff denied stealing resident personal items. LPA was unable to interview other residents in care due to the facility closing on 04/30/2025. There was no evidence to corroborate the allegation.
The allegation that Facility staff did not ensure resident had enough to eat. LPA was unable to interview Resident #1 (R1); the resident died on 07/29/2024. LPA interviewed staff, and staff denied not ensuring resident with enough food to eat. Staff stated that there was enough food for the residents at the facility. LPA was unable to interview other residents in care due to the facility closing on 04/30/2025. There was no evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Based on evidence obtained during this investigation, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy of this report was provided to Jaewon Hong, Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. |