1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During staff interviews, 2 out of the 6 staff informed LPA R1 personal belongings were delivered at their home on July 9 2024 . 1 out of the 6 staff stated, that S2 was the designated driver who delivered R1 belongings. S2 confirmed belongings were delivered.
For the allegation, Facility did not issue a refund to resident per the admission's agreement.
During staff interviews, S1 informed LPA that the facility had issued R1 refund on July 2024. S3 confirmed R1 POA had received refund through mailing addressed.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the (3) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance to evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided Administrator Kimberly Jordan.
|