During staff interview 5 out of the 5 staff stated that each resident has a designated laundry day. During resident interviews 5 out of the 5 staff stated their clothes are washed by staff members. During facility tour, LPA observed resident’s laundry day posted in their bedroom. In addition, LPA received a copy of all resident’s laundry schedule.
For the allegation, Facility is malodorous.
During staff interviews, 5 out of the 5 staff informed LPA the facility is not malodorous. During resident interviews 5 out of the 5 residents stated the facility will smell bad when someone has an accident. 4 out of the 5 resident staff will clean their accident to avoid a strong odor.
For the allegation, Facility staff did not safeguard residents’ personal belongings.
During staff interviews, 5 out of the 5 staff stated they are not responsible for resident finances. 4 out of the 5 staff stated that each resident has their own dresser for their own clothes. During resident interviews 5 out of the 5 residents stated they personal belongings are not missing.
For the allegation, Staff did not ensure that resident’s dental needs were met.
During staff interviews, 5 out of the 5 staff stated that some residents are independent for their own dental needs. 5 out of the 5 staff stated that they will provide dental care needs for R1. During resident interviews 4 out of the 5 residents stated they they do not need assistance with their dental needs. 1 out of the 5 residents stated they receive assistance with their dental needs.
For the allegation, Staff did not ensure that resident’s hygiene needs were met.
During staff interviews 5 out of the 5 staff stated that residents who are independent staff will provide reminders to shower, change their clothes, and brush their teeth. During residents’ interviews, 4 out of the 5 residents stated they are independent for their own hygiene. 1 out of the 5 resident stated that they received assistance with their hygiene.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the (6) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided Administrator Danica Turner.
|