1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | are having inappropriate interactions with residents. LPA Williams was unable to interview Staff #4 (S4) to retrieve a statement. LPA Williams interviewed R1, R2, and R3, who all denied staff members were having inappropriate reactions with them.
In regards to allegation #3, LPA Williams interviewed S1, S2, and S3, who all denied that residents are being chemically restrained and their medications are being dispensed inappropriately. S2 stated that medications are dispensed appropriately within physician's orders and medications are only handled by trained staff. S2 denied that R1's medications were given to R2 in order to chemically restrain R2. LPA Williams interviewed R1, R2, and R3, who all denied that staff members are mishandling medications. R1 and R2 both denied feeling unreasonably lethargic or sleepy due to over-medication. LPA Williams reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) in which it appeared medications were dispensed appropriately.
In regards to allegation #4, LPA Williams interviewed S2 who denied being intoxicated while providing care to the residents. S2 stated that they once had a beverage in a can which looked similar to that of an alcoholic beverage; however, S2 adamantly stated that the beverage was non-alcoholic. LPA Williams interviewed S1 and S3 who denied witnessing S1 providing care to residents while intoxicated.
In regards to allegation #5, LPA Williams interviewed S1 who stated that Staff #4 (S4) was not employed by the facility at anytime. S1 stated that they told S4 that they were unable to work for the facility as S4's background clearance had not been approved. S1 stated that S4 did not work at the facility nor provided care for the residents. LPA Williams interviewed S2 and S3 who also stated that S4 did not provide care to residents in the facility and was let go upon learning S4's background clearance denial.
In regards to allegation #6, LPA Williams interviewed S1, S2, and S3, who all denied threatening the residents nor have they witnessed other staff members threatening the residents. LPA Williams interviewed R1, R2, and R3, who all denied that staff members have threatened them.
Based on evidence obtained during today’s visit, LPA has determined that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed and a copy was provided to the facility representative.
|