1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation #2: Staff are not following universal precautions to prevent the spread of infectious disease. - Based on interviews with residents and staff, all parties reported that universal precautions were consistently followed to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Resident #1 (R1) was evaluated by an external provider, who determined that R1 had shingles after another resident had already been placed in the same room. Facility staff are not medical professionals and relied on external assessments. Both residents are under quarantine. The allegation cannot be substantiated.
Allegation #3: Staff do not treat residents with respect. – Interviews with staff and residents indicated that staff treat residents respectfully. When behavioral issues arise, staff use communication and redirection techniques to de-escalate the situation. There was no evidence that residents were placed in time-out for inappropriate behavior. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated.
Information received during investigation LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations.
Based on the evidence, the allegations mentioned above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time.
An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099 and LIC9099C were discussed and provided to Janeth Gonzalez.
|