1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | To the resident's knowledge, the eviction had been rescinded after it was addressed with management. An interview with an additional internal source corroborated the facility had work with the resident, the eviction was rescinded, but the resident was warned the behavior could lead to an eviction. Records obtained at the facility corroborated house rules stated physical abuse toward other residents, or staff could potentially lead to the facility requesting the resident vacate the facility.
It was alleged the facility had an unqualified staff assisting with medication at the facility. Interviews with internal sources consistently stated the facility staff assisting with medication were knowledgeable and knew what they were doing. An interview with an external source corroborated the staff in question was trained, and the staff would often have assistance from other trained staff at the facility. Records reviewed corroborated the staff in question had undergone training on how to assist residents with medication.
It was alleged the facility did not provide a safe environment. An internal source reported outside individuals would often enter the facility grounds and staff would not do anything about it. Interviews with internal sources consistently reported the facility staff would ask the unknown individuals to leave the facility. When the unknown individuals declined to leave the property, staff did call law enforcement for assistance. The facility build a fence and posted signs to deter outside individuals from entering the facility. Records obtained from an outside source did not reveal any concerns with staff not addressing this concern.
It was alleged staff did not treat residents with dignity. An internal source reported the facility staff would call residents inappropriate names. Interviews with internal sources revealed conflicting statements. Some statements indicated the facility staff had not been witnessed to call resident names, and that staff often had to deal with the residents calling staff names. Other internal statements stated staff was heard calling residents names, but were not able to disclose, or refused to disclose which staff, resident, nor what was heard. Interviews with external sources did not reveal any concerns regarding staff not treating the residents with dignity.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove
the alleged violation(s) did, or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Med Tech, Stephanie Ortega, to whom a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to. |