1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Records reflect Resident 1 required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. A review of Resident 1’s medication administration records illustrated that staff consistently gave Resident 1’s medications without any lapses. Interviews with residents reported no complaints in the level of care or responsiveness by staff. Staff interviews revealed that Resident 1 had severe Dementia and required a high level of attention. Staff said they followed the prescribed care plan, which included Resident 1’s special diet plan. Facility staff did not recall Resident 1 reporting to them that they lost personal property. Facility staff denied ever taking or losing any of Resident 1’s personal belongings. Staff also said they brushed Resident 1’s teeth in the morning and before they went to bed.
An interview with Resident 1’s responsible party reported stated that Resident 1 had Dementia, Type 1 Diabetes and suffered from short term memory loss. This interview revealed that Resident 1 was not always truthful and complained to staff a lot. The responsible party said facility staff always met Resident 1’s needs, kept the facility clean and fed Resident 1 well. Responsible party advised that staff placed a bell in Resident 1’s room to call for assistance. However, the responsible party said staff had to take it every once in a while, because Resident 1 was disruptive and constantly ring the bell. Resident 1’s responsible party was never concerned that staff were not responsive to Resident 1’s needs. The responsible party also stated that Resident 1 brushed their own teeth regularly. The responsible party advised staff that Resident 1 could do it themselves and encouraged staff to let Resident 1 do things for themselves. Responsible party said facility staff followed their guidance.
Responsible party said Resident 1 never complained of personal property being stolen or lost. Responsible party stated that staff strictly followed Resident 1’s diet plan. Interviews yielded that Resident 1 was a vegetarian by choice but did eat chicken and fish. No red meat. When asked, this source said Resident 1 preferred fish but could eat chicken and it was part of their diet plan. The responsible party also said staff took great care in caring for chronic sores on Resident 1’s hip and foot. The responsible party said Resident 1 was non-ambulatory and they never saw any facility record documenting that Resident 1 was ambulatory. After reviews of facility documentation and interviews of staff, residents and outside sources there is insufficient information to support the allegations.
Based on the evidence obtained during this investigation, the aforementioned allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Sanchez; a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided to Administrator Sanchez. |