1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to a review of the treating medical agency’s records, on June 3, 2020, R1 was seen by the agency to assess the changes in R1’s behavior. At that time, the agency felt that R1 did not meet the criteria for additional support.
On June 19, 2020, R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall while at the facility. As a result, R1 was transported to the hospital, examined, and returned with an assistive device for ambulatory purposes.
On July 01, 2020, R1 followed up with the treating agency. At that time, the administrator voiced their concern about R1’s change in their level of care. On July 15, 2020, the administrator called the agency and reported additional changes in R1’s physical and mental state. Thereby, R1 was transported to the treating agency for an evaluation, in which the exam confirmed an overall change in R1’s condition. Based on that assessment, it was jointly agreed among the providers that R1 required a higher level of care.
LPA interviewed a random sampling of residents, including the responsible parties, and their interviews did not support the allegation. R1’s interview produced inconsistencies due to their cognitive impairment, as they were unable to remember the facility mentioned above. Staff declined the allegation, as the records reflect their persistence in voicing R1’s change in condition to the treating agency.
Based on interviews conducted and a review of documents, there is insufficient evidence to prove or disprove that the allegation occurred; therefore, the complaint investigation findings are found to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver Eveline Denpon, and the Licensee’s Rights (LIC9058 01/16) along with a copy of this report was forwarded to the facility's email address. A reply email or return receipt from the administrator will confirm receipt of documents. |