1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that the Licensee did not allow residents to leave the facility, attend medical appointments, or allow visitation. Record review of the Provider Information Notice (PIN) 21-40-ASC revealed that the visitation guidance at that time required that individuals requesting an indoor visitation are required to show either proof of COVID-19 vaccination or proof of a negative COVID-19 test taken within 72 hours. Visitors requesting an outdoor visit were not required to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination or negative COVID-19 test. PIN 21-40-ASC was in effect from August 27, 2021 to January 18, 2022. Interviews and records review revealed that on or around September 2021, the Licensee Josephine Perez told family members of residents that indoor and outdoor visitation was not allowed per COVID-19 guidance from Community Care Licensing (CCL). Interviews with family members revealed that they were not able to visit their family members at the facility. During a visit on 12/9/2021, LPA Ruiz observed a visitor was allowed into the facility. Interviews with the Licensees, residents, and outside sources revealed that R1 was not vaccinated for COVID-19 and was told by Licensee Josephine Perez that R1 would have to quarantine in R1’s room for 14 days if they left the facility, regardless of COVID-19 exposure. PIN 21-17.2-ASC stated that “residents have the right to leave facilities for outing” and are not required to be quarantined after returning from an outing unless they had a close contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19. PIN 21-17.2-ASC was in effect from May 14, 2021 to January 18, 2022. Interviews with residents and outside sources revealed that R1 did not leave the facility for personal outings and medical appointments because of the potential 14-day quarantine. Interviews and records review revealed that R1 had a medical appointment on 11/18/2021 and the Licensee informed R1’s family that a fully vaccinated individual or an individual who received a negative COVID test needed to take R1 to the medical appointment and that the Licensee offered transportation services to R1 but R1 refused. As a result, R1’s family member canceled R1’s medical appointment.
It was alleged that the Licensee unlawfully evicted R1. Review of records revealed that on 11/15/2021, Licensee Josephine Perez told R1’s responsible party that a fully vaccinated individual or an individual who had received a negative COVID test would be required to transport R1 to a medical appointment and if R1 and R1’s responsible parties could not follow those guidelines, the Licensee would “consider this as the beginning of [R1’s] 30-day notice”. Records revealed that on or around 12/3/2021, the Licensee Josephine Perez told R1’s responsible party that R1 had verbally given the Licensee a 30-day notice to move out. Interviews with the Licensees stated that R1’s responsible party provided a 30-day move out notice, which conflicted with the records reviewed during the investigation. Interviews with the Licensees and outside sources revealed that R1 moved out of the facility on or around the end of December 2021.
Continued on LIC-9099-C page. |