1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Monday night. It was discovered during the investigation that on a Monday evening, while C1 was away from the facility, C1 experienced a fall that resulted in a hand laceration. It is unclear as to the exact time that the injury occurred, but interviews indicate that the incident and resulting injury occurred at least a couple of hours prior to C1’s return. As was C1’s routine, C1 returned to the facility at approximately 10:00/10:30 PM, and staff were made aware of the laceration. Evidence indicates that the facility’s nurse, who was not onsite, was sent a photo of C1’s hand at approximately 11:45 PM, and C1’s hand was evaluated by the nurse on the following day. C1 was informed by the facility’s nurse that medical attention was required. Interviews yielded that C1 was transported by facility staff to an urgent care location and, subsequently, a local emergency room. According to evidence obtained during the investigation, no medical services were provided at the urgent care location. While in the emergency room, C1’s hand was bandaged, and C1 was sent back to the facility. C1 and accompanying staff were informed that no additional medical action could be taken at that time because too much time had lapsed since the laceration occurred. C1 and staff were informed that medical attention should have been sought at the time the incident and resulting injury occurred.
As indicated above, the incident that caused the laceration occurred while C1 was away from the facility and not under the direct care of facility staff, C1 was advised by hospital personnel that the laceration should have been treated at the time it occurred, and facility staff were not aware of the injury until hours after the occurrence. The foregoing does not yield evidence that is sufficient enough to conclude that hospital staff’s inability to take additional medical action at the time C1 was evaluated was due to lack of action by facility staff.
Based upon the foregoing, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Kathi Baer, and copies of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to the administrator at the conclusion of the visit. Kathi Baer’s signature on this report acknowledges receipt of copies of the rights and report. |