1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099)
Per staff and client interviews, daily chores were divided among the staff and clients help as well. For instance, clients were responsible for cleaning their rooms, making their own beds, and doing their own laundry. The daily chores were reviewed with clients at the time of admission. When clients refused or were not able to complete their assigned chores staff were required to complete the chores as required. No deficiencies were noted in this area during the investigation.
Furthermore, it was alleged that facility did not have necessary hygiene products for clients. During the tour of the facility conducted on August 6, 2021, two large storage areas were observed with an ample supply of hygiene items. The storage areas for hygiene items were locked and inaccessible to clients. To ensure the health and safety of high-risk clients, certain hygiene items were restricted, such as razors and mouthwash. Per staff statements, hygiene items were purchased from three different vendors once or twice per week to meet client needs. The night crew was responsible for completing an inventory overnight, based on the inventory, the assigned staff member as well as the program director were responsible for purchasing what was needed to meet the clients’ needs. Certain hygiene items were purchased twice a week because the demand was high on those products, such as paper towels, tissue paper, and some toiletries. Review of purchase invoices for the month of June, July and August of 2021 confirmed that an adequate supply of hygiene items was purchased each week. During interviews, clients did not raise any concerns about not having the hygiene products they needed. Based on observations, interviews with staff, clients and outside sources and review of records, there was insufficient evidence to support this allegation.
Based on the results of the investigation, which consisted of observations, interviews with key staff and outside sources, and review of pertinent client and facility records there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Therefore, these allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Program Director, Laura Cooke, to whom a copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. |