1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099C)
In addition, R1 requested the thermostats to be relocated twice as well in December 2023 and in January 2024. Maintenance checked and replaced the vents inside their apartment and adjusted the vent louvres located in the hallway to point away from their entry door. Maintenance staff replaced the weather stripping of the entry door and tested it to ensure no air was coming through the door by placing a big blower directly outside the door. On April 8, 2024, R1 hired an independent HVAC consultant to conduct a study and investigate the heating and airflow issues in their apartment. Per an interview with the independent consultant, the project consisted of doing an initial document review, site inspection, preliminary analysis, and consultation with R1. The consultant said that they placed sensors inside the apartment, outside on the terrace, and in the hallway and the readings of the sensors did not detect or disclose any problems with the room temperature. The sensors were placed for several days continuously which monitored the temperature during the day as well as at night. The independent consultant’s findings were consistent with the studies conducted by the facility’s engineers and the maintenance staff. Interviews with multiple residents living on the same floor near R1’s apartment did not disclose any problems with their HVAC. Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, there was insufficient evidence that facility staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature in R1’s apartment.
It was also alleged that staff did not meet residents’ dietary needs. This allegation was previously investigated by CCL on August 8, 2022. A review of R1's residential agreement indicated that the provider would accommodate customary and reasonable special diets that are prescribed by a physician. A review of R1's Physician's Report dated April 23, 2024, indicated that R1 is allergic to dairy, eggs, and whey. A review of R1's medical records did not disclose any other changes in R1’s diet that required modifications ordered by R1’s physician. There were no records showing that the doctor prescribed any modifications based on medical necessity. Interviews were conducted with residents, including the Chair of the Residents’ Counsel. Residents interviewed indicated that modified diets were available for residents who needed them, including alternative meals for residents with allergies. Resident interviews also indicated that given the diverse population of the residents in care, the facility made every effort to please residents, however, some residents will enjoy certain items, whereas others will not.
(Continue at LIC9099C) |