1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to facility records, R1 was diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), indicating that R1 was alert, oriented, and could communicate needs. Outside source interviews also confirmed that R1 is alert and oriented. Facility’s visitation logs revealed that R1 was visited frequently by family members. Interviews with R1, an outside source, and staff denied the allegation and corroborated that the facility facilitated visitation.
Outside source interviews revealed that R1 had made statements about preferring in person visits, instead of communicating over the phone or internet. R1 stated that they had an iPhone that they knew how to use. LPA also observed that the facility did provide a computer with internet access and also access to a printer. R1 stated they had knowledge of the facility computer but did not use it. Outside source records also revealed that R1 had communicated clearly to family members and staff how and when they wished to have visits. R1 expressed that they visit with family via FaceTime and in person as well. R1 had expressed with multiple outside sources whom they did and did not want visits from. Title 22, Chapter 8, section 87468.2(a)(21) allows residents to consent to visitors of their choosing.
Based on the evidence obtained during the complaint investigation, the allegation that the licensee did not facilitate virtual visits is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director; a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided to Executive Director. |