1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility is in disrepair
Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation, LPA S Martinez interviewed staff (Former ED, BOM, MD) and residents (R1, R2, R3) who stated that the facility did not have an adequate amount of housekeeping staff to clean the residents’ rooms. Observations revealed clutter/trash in residents’ rooms, multiple rooms with smells of urine emanating into the hallways, room empty with half full male urinals in rooms. Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed with LPA S Martinez that the facility only had one housekeeper assigned to clean over 100 rooms per week. MD also stated that multiple residents have expressed concerns about their rooms not being cleaned. On 10/15/25, LPA D Panlilio requested copies of written documentation regarding facility’s maintenance records from ED. Due to facility closure on 09/30/23, ED stated archived documents were no longer available for this facility. LPA was also unable to contact former staff and residents to obtain additional information on the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that facility is in disrepair was found to be unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Licensee did not meet resident’s needs
Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation, LPA S Martinez interviewed reporting party (RP), residents (R1, R2), Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and staff (ED). RP stated that the facility staff are changing R1’s colostomy bag every 10 days instead of the agreed 4 days. On 10/15/25, LPA D Panlilio requested copies of written documentation regarding R1’s signed admission agreement, Needs & Services plan, level of care notes and incident reports from ED. Due to facility closure on 09/30/23, ED stated archived documents were no longer available for this facility. LPA was also unable to contact former staff and residents to obtain additional information on the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that licensee did not meet resident’s needs was found to be unsubstantiated.
Continued on next page, LIC9099-C pg2 |