1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA, accompanied by C1, observed C1's bedroom door and secured a photo. LPA observed the door can only be locked from inside C1's bedroom by pushing a button centered in the doorknob. LPA asked C1 to lock the door, and C1 proceeded to shut the door and then pressed the button and locked the door. LPA then asked C1 to unlock and open the door, C1 then turned the doorknob, which automatically unlocked the door, and opened the door with ease. LPA observed C1's bedroom doorknob facing the facility hallway and observed had a small hole that allowed staff to unlock the door utilizing a small device that is inserted into the hole to unlock the door in the case C1 locked themselves in their room.
It was also alleged staff did not provide quality food to clients. An interview conducted with an Outside Source (OS1) revealed staff did not provide substantial meals to clients in care. Interviews conducted with clients revealed staff provided meals and snacks, and clients felt well fed. Client interviews also revealed staff had made a pasta dish the day of the visit on March 9, 2023. An interview with facility staff corroborated clients had pasta earlier that day and revealed staff made a variety of different meals for the clients in care. LPA secured and reviewed the facility menu for the month of March 2023 which revealed three (3) meals and two (2) snacks were planned for the entire month. A tour of the facility kitchen revealed a sufficient amount of food per Title 22 mandate.
It was also alleged facility staff did not follow food storage requirement. An interview conducted with an Outside Source (OS1) revealed clients were not able to access food because facility staff locked the kitchen cabinets. LPA conducted a tour of the kitchen and observed that the only cabinet doors with locks were on cabinets that contained toxins and hazards such as cleaning supplies and knives. LPA observed the cabinets containing food were all accessible to clients in care. Interviews with staff and clients both revealed food was not kept locked at the facility.
Due to lack of corroborating evidence, the finding regarding the above allegations were established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means although the allegations may have happened or could be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
LPA Correia conducted an exit interview with Caregiver Adonay. At the time of the exit interview Caregiver Adonay was advised a copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC9058 01-2016) will be provided and signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the rights.
|