1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 9/11/20 and 9/15/20, R1 displayed an inability to follow instructions regarding their physical therapy and was discharged due to lack of follow through between sessions. R1 also became a two-person transfer. On 10/02/20, it was noted that R1’s blister and wounds had improved and were healing. Notes reflect home health care personnel provided facility staff education on hydration and diet.
Based on a review of the home health care documents did not indicate the presence of a care plan as outlined in 87609 Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies (b) Incidental medical care may be provided to residents through a licensed home health agency provided the following conditions are met: (4) The licensee and home health agency agree in writing on the responsibilities of the home health agency, and those of the licensee in caring for the resident’s medical condition(s).
LPA obtained copies directly from R1’s home health care because the facility did not have a plan of care on file. The facility’s home health care document retained had limited information and did not delineate a care plan for physical therapy that the resident was receiving, or the wound care for the blister.
The Department’s investigation revealed that R1 underwent a change in condition (skin breakdown), but the licensee did not conduct an appropriate reappraisal, and did not have an appropriate home health plan on file at the facility to address R1’s diabetic foot ulcer. Resident had a blister on the left heel that turned into a stage three pressure injury after diagnosis at the hospital wound care department. Per home health care notes, Licensee signed off on R1’s plan of care - acknowledging understanding what care facility staff was to provide (however, licensee did not retain a copy). Records showed that R1 was discharged from physical therapy due to their dementia diagnosis and lack of physical exercises completed outside of physical therapy sessions because the resident was unable to follow directions. According to the notes, the facility only had one staff working at a time and the resident subsequently required a two-person transfer. R1 was admitted on 10/27/20 to the hospital for a UTI/dehydration and transferred to another hospital for wound care on 10/28/20 per R1’s medical records.
Based on the Department’s investigation which consisted of review of pertinent records and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 on the attached 9099D. A copy of this report and Appeal and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the former Licensee, via USPS Certified Mail. |