1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff further stated that due to the small size of the facility their were no call bells since the residents were continuously checked on.
LPA visit to the facility on March 23, 2022 found R1 in a clean and well kempt state. R1 was eating in the dining room and appeared confused while repeatedly asking the Licensee of the facility "who are you?" LPA attempted to interview R1 but immediately ended the interview after R1 appeared upset and agitated.
Outside agency interview revealed no knowledge of any staff pushing R1 or treating them in an inappropriate manner. Outside agency stated that R1's responsible party (RP) was regularly at the facility and never mentioned any issues with the staff or the facility. Outside agency further stated that R1's RP advised them that they wanted to move R1 to a facility with higher functioning residents since R1 was having a very hard time adjusting to living in a senior care facility.
Interview with responsible party (RP) on May 19, 2023 revealed R1 initially had a difficult time adjusting to living at the facility since prior to that they were living independently in a mobile home. RP stated that they visited R1 daily and did not witness any abuse firsthand. RP stated that R1 was ambulatory and would move throughout the facility. RP further stated that R1 would call staff on R1's personal phone if R1 needed anything.
Interview with Administrator on May 18, 2023 revealed that at the beginning of R1's stay at the facility R1 did not like to socialize and would stay in their room day and night. Administrator stated that the facility had several Spanish speaking staff members that would verbally redirect R1 on occasion but R1 was never pushed or physically abused by any staff at the facility. Administrator stated that R1 would receive visits from their RP regularly and would also receive outside agency visits twice a week. Administrator stated that she never received any complaints against staff from RP or any outside agency.
Based upon the foregoing, the above listed allegations are unsubstantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met and the allegations are not valid.
A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) was mailed via USPS Certified Mail to the former licensee’s mailing address on file.
|