1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099)
The details of the allegation specifically indicated that the resident had been discharged from a hospital and admitted to the facility on November 2, 2022, without the licensee conducting a required preadmission assessment. During staff interviews administrator acknowledged that an in-person preadmission assessment was not completed due to visitation limitations in the hospital related to Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Staff stated that they completed an assessment over the telephone with hospital staff. Facility staff stated that they relied on the information that was provided by the hospital to complete the Resident Appraisal (LIC 603A) during the admission process. The day after admission, facility staff observed the resident to have medical conditions needing a higher level of care that had not been communicated to the licensee by the hospital staff.
In addition, it was also alleged that the licensee did not provide a 30-day eviction notice once facility staff determined the resident’s medical condition needed a higher level of care than what they could provide. Interviews with staff and outside sources disclosed that although there were communications with resident’s family regarding the need to relocate resident to a different facility that could provide a higher level of care, a written 30-Day notice was not given to the resident or responsible party. Evidence obtained during the investigation determined that a voluntary relocation of the resident had initially been agreed to by all parties involved. However, once this decision changed, a 30-day notice should have been issued by the licensee along with a written reappraisal to indicate a higher level of care was now needed.
The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and has found that there was sufficient evidence to corroborate the above allegations. Therefore, these allegations are deemed to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations and are listed on LIC 9099-D. A plan of corrections was developed with Administrator, Esther Camagay.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Esther Camagay, to whom a copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. |