1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Wellness Director explained she asked both individuals in person, while they were at the facility assisting other residents. On 06/26/24, the verbal request for additional PT was due to R1’s feet hurting, and difficulty ambulating was sent to the Home Health agency. The Home Health agency’s interview confirmed receiving the request and stated the following day on 06/27/24, the therapist responded to the request. The therapist stated R1 needed a higher level of care, reached maximum potential, with no current rehabilitation potential. Therefore, PT was not authorized. R1’s interview revealed they asked the facility for additional PT but did not receive it. However, the decision was up to the Home Health agency, not the facility. R1 is currently receiving PT through a different Home Health agency. The facility complied with Title 22 Regulations and assisted R1 with the request for additional PT.
During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegation. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Administrator, Rocio Granda whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. This is an amended version of the original report created on 08/20/24. |