1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, the image only showed two legs and feet that were wrapped in bandages with no visible wound. Interview with staff present between February 2021 and March 2021 did not reveal any resident with a wound that was not being treated by an outside source. Additionally, outside source interview could not corroborate that licensee is not addressing residents change in conditions.
It was also alleged that licensee was not meeting Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3’s incontinence care. According to interviews with staff present R1, R2, and R3’s incontinence needs were met. Interview with current residents corroborated that they are currently receiving incontinence care timely and appropriately. Lastly, LPA Strong reviewed records that confirmed R1 was being provided incontinence care regularly.
It was also alleged that licensee is not meeting resident’s care needs in that they are not providing residents with showers. Interview with residents did not corroborate that they are not receiving showers regularly. Records reviewed revealed residents have scheduled shower days and are allowed to decline showers. Interview without outside source could not corroborate that residents do not receive regular showers.
Additionally, it was alleged that facility did not have sufficient staffing between February 2021 and March of 2021. Records reviewed revealed that there were, on average, 3.75 staff present within the Assisted Living area. Interviews with outside source revealed there is staff turnover, but they have not witnessed short staffing within the last three years. Interview with staff revealed though there are times staff may be limited, managers and supervisors assist in resident care.
Lastly it was alleged that licensee is not meeting R3’s dietary needs as they required chopped or pureed food. Interview with residents revealed that if they need a special diet the facility would accommodate their needs or special requests. Interview with staff established that R3 was provided with their specific dietary need but would purchase own food that was not part of their specialized diet. Interview with outside source established that there have been no issues observed with resident’s food accommodations.
Based on LPA's interviews, and record reviews there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Rocio Granda, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided. |