1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | their cheek. Furthermore, outside source and relevant persons did not express any concerns regarding staff treatment towards residents. Resident 1’s (R1) home health stated that if there were any physical evidence that R1 was hit in the face, a bruise would’ve appeared due to the nature of their fragile skin and the medication that makes their skin prone to bruising. There were no other relevant witnesses or physical evidence to corroborate that this type of abuse occurred at the facility. LPA was unable to interview residents as majority have expired during the course of the investigation.
It was also alleged that staff had aggressively handled R1 that resulted in their bruising on their body. Licensees shall ensure that all residents are free from all types of abuse – including physical. In interviews conducted with multiple sources, it was revealed that the resident was observed to have had bruises. There were concerns that the bruising may have occurred from staff members at the facility handling the resident in a rough manner when transferring or repositioning them. Outside source made a statement that it was reported to them that R1 was hit by staff, however, they did not observe this incident firsthand. Interviews conducted with multiple sources revealed that they had not ever heard of or seen any staff members handling the resident in a rough manner during changes, transferring or repositioning. Outside sources confirmed the presence of the bruises but stated verbally that there were no immediate concerns that the bruises were the result of staff being intentionally rough with the resident. The resident’s home health had indicated that the resident is taking medications that make them more prone to bruising. Furthermore, records revealed that R1 has a medical condition which made them more susceptible to bruising.
Based on interviews and record review, the above-mentioned allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided to the Licensee via electronic mail. An electronic read receipt confirmation was requested to be sent by the Licensee upon receipt of the documents. |