1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | On October 20, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz met with Charles Bloom for a Case Management visit to follow-up on a substantiated allegation that facility did not protect resident.
On April 16, 2019, the Department received a complaint alleging “facility failed to protect resident”. The Department conducted an investigation and determined that resident (R1) resided in the “memory care” unit in the facility. On March 31, 2019 around 8:00 p.m., R1 exited the memory care unit through an unlocked side door which led to an outside terrace area. Per staff interviews, staff was unaware that R1 wasn’t in the memory care unit until approximately 9:00 p.m. At 9:55 p.m., R1 was found lying face down on the ground in the outdoor patio. R1 was semi-conscious and observed as having dirt in their mouth and dried blood on their arms, along with extensive scratches and bruising. Hospital records confirmed R1 was diagnosed upon admission with dehydration, a closed left lateral rib fracture, a displaced left middle finger fracture, contusions of both the left and right knee, and lacerations of the left wrist. R1 was hospitalized from March 31 to April 2, 2019.
On December 20, 2019, the Department substantiated the allegation that the “Facility failed to protect resident” and the licensee was cited for violating the California Code of Regulations Title 22 (22 CCR), § 87705(j) Care of Persons with Dementia, which states, “The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits, if exiting presents a hazard to any resident.” The licensee did not protect R1 by not having a functional auditory device, which resulted in elopement, serious bodily injury, and posed an immediate safety risk to a resident in care. The licensee was informed that a civil penalty was still being determined and may be assessed based on Health and Safety (HSC) §1569.49.
Continued on LIC809-C page. |