1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Medical assessment indicate that R1 is non-ambulatory and requires a 2-person assist with transfers. On October 20th, 2019, interviews and records revealed that R1’s private caregiver called the
front desk around 2:45PM to request for assistance in R1’s room. Evidence obtained from staff interview confirms that the private caregiver reached out to the front desk to ask for assistance and advised that they will be leaving shortly. Front desk alerted facility staff that R1’s private caregiver is requesting for assistance. Around 3:00PM, another call was made to the front desk from the private caregiver to report that no staff have responded to the initial request. Another attempt was made by the Receptionist to alert staff that R1’s private caregiver is asking for assistance. Around 3:30PM, private caregiver came down to the front desk and notified Receptionist that they are off work and R1 is in her wheelchair. Private caregiver reported that none of the staff came in to check on R1 to provide them assistance. From on or about 2:45PM to 5:10PM, none of the facility staff checked in on R1 or responded to the multiple request made from the caregiver. Interview with Administrator revealed that staff do not typically check on residents with a private caregiver unless they request for assistance. Around 5:10PM, facility staff (S1 – See Confidential Names List on LIC 811) came in to check on R1 while making their rounds and was found on the floor in their room, next to their bed. An assessment was conducted on R1 and a bruise was observed on their right side of rib and lower leg, but no pain or fractures incurred from the fall.
Based on evidence obtained from interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility staff neglected to respond to R1’s private caregiver’s request for assistance. Although staff acknowledged that R1 is a 2-person assist, no response was received when multiple attempts were made to request for help, leaving R1 on their own after the private caregiver left. Therefore, the allegation is found to be substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and noted on the attached LIC 9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, and was provided a copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights, via electronic mail, after conclusion of the visit. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent to LPA upon receipt of the documents. |