1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC9099]
LPA interviewed RP on 02/19/2026, who acknowledged that R1’s intake may not have seemed optimal, but also noted that R1 gained 4.8 pounds between February 10 and February 19, 2026. RP further clarified that based on their own assessments, R1 was capable of using the restroom independently.
On February 19, 2026, LPA conducted a site visit and reviewed R1’s records. LPA observed that since July 2025, R1 had been diagnosed with severe malnutrition associated with mild to moderate oropharyngeal dysphagia, which results in impaired swallow strength. Records indicated that R1 experienced sadness and reduced appetite related to feelings of loneliness. R1’s pre placement appraisal, dated January 5, 2026, documented that R1 was able to use the restroom independently.
During the visit, LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1), the Resident Care Director. S1 reported that R1 was admitted in early January 2026 and initially appeared shy and unwilling to eat. According to S1, R1 was prescribed a pureed diet but was selective about the types of food they would accept, requiring staff to try different options. S1 further explained that R1 would not eat when being observed, so staff would place food within reach and step away to allow R1 to eat independently.
On April 14, 2026, LPA interviewed an outside source familiar with R1 (OS1). OS1 stated that due to cognitive impairment, R1 is often unaware of their surroundings. OS1 reported that R1 frequently assumed food had to be purchased and, because they did not have money, avoided requesting meals out of fear they could not pay. OS1 also noted that R1 has experienced significant decline over the past year due to multiple relocations. According to OS1, R1 does not require toileting assistance and wears adult diapers only to prevent potential accidents. OS1 stated that R1 typically refuses assistance when it is offered.
Based on records reviewed, LPA observations, and interviews conducted with RP, outside source and staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, and the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations.
Report and Appeal Rights discussed with and provided to Licensee. Signature below confirms receipt. |