1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
While the information gathered during staff interviews indicated that staff may have stood close by during R1's visit, the justification was due to a facility-wide policy, supported by CCLD PIN recommendations, that had been communicated to families in writing and corroborated by review of records. Additional staff interview revealed opinions from staff that the Licensee made every effort possible, within guidelines, to ensure visitation/communication was maximized for residents and their families. Staff interviews did not give corroborating evidence that R1's visits/communication was restricted.
Interviews with staff and an Outside Individual (OI) revealed that the family member in question did not receive all facility communication because they were not R1's Responsible Party. Additional outside sources did not respond for interview. Due to their baseline memory loss, R1 was unable to participate as a reliable historian/interviewee regarding the allegation.
Records review revealed weekly email communication by the Administrator to the community on June 22nd 2020, and from September 3rd 2020 to December 29th 2020 regarding Covid-19 updates and protocols. Each email included visitation policy/protocol updates that were consistent with CCLD PIN recommendations for visitation during that time. No records were found to corroborate that the visitation/communication policies were specific to R1 or their family. On the contrary, the records revealed that the facility made attempts to offer visitation for residents in multiple ways such as in person, indoor, outdoor, virtually, while in isolation, and through social media. Review of a Department Provider Information Notice (PIN) 20-38-ASC, which was in effect during the timeframe of the complaint, allowed for facilities to restrict/limit visitation without a waiver due to the state of emergency. The PIN outlined when facilities must allow and restrict visitation under specific circumstances. The information was consistent with the evidence found regarding visitation procedures at the facility.
Based on interviews and records review, the investigation did not yield sufficient evidence to conclude that the resident was not allowed to communicate freely with family, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were mailed to the last known address on file for the facility. |