1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Review of records determined that the facility had implemented additional fall preventive measures (high/low bed, fall mat, tab alarm) which were documented in R1's agreed-upon needs and services plan. Staff had discussed fall concerns and resident resistance to interventions during a care planning teleconference that was held with R1's responsible party, less than a week prior to the fall incident on 10/28/19. Staff expressed concern that R1 was removing the tab alarm at night and continued to try and get up without waiting for assistance. Interviews with staff and records confirmed that the facility followed required procedures to document ongoing observations of this resident, and consulted with R1's primary care physician and R1's responsible party to discuss this resident's increased care needs. On the day of the fall incident, staff had observed R1 in a common area approximately fifteen to twenty minutes before the resident was found on the floor of their their own room. Staff interviews and records showed R1 was being monitored at intervals consistent with the needs and services plan that was in place and with the current level of care assessment. Interviews with outside sources did not express having concerns about staff neglect or lack of supervision.
Evidence obtained during the investigation did not support the allegation that staff lack of supervision resulted in R1's injury. Based on interviews and record reviews, the allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation could have happened, there was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation occurred, and the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was virtually conducted with Administrator Johnson and a copy of this report provided via email, with electronic signatures and read receipt as confirmation of report delivery. |